Trane Technologies is a provider of air conditioning and heating technology with its legal seat in Ireland. Under the Trane and Thermo King brands it makes air conditioners, heat pumps and refrigeration systems for buildings, data centers and refrigerated transport. Its main business is in North America. As of Oct 11, 2026
Trane Technologies designs, manufactures and services heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems as well as transport refrigeration. The products carry mainly the Trane and Thermo King brands. The Americas segment comprises commercial and residential HVAC, building controls, energy services and transport refrigeration. Other segments serve Europe, the Middle East and Africa as well as the Asia Pacific region. The offering ranges from heat pumps and cooling for data centers to maintenance and rental. In the United States, business runs through its own branches, distributors and contractors, and abroad through subsidiaries and dealers.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Feb 5, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
Was in the buy zone
The price was in the buy zone and is now back just above it.
As of: Close of the 4-hour candle Oct 27, 2026, 18:30 · Buy zone in the trade plan · An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) Already existing when added to the recording (added on Oct 19, 2026) · Setup confirmed on Oct 15, 2026 · last changed on Oct 23, 2026 Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) No entry in the zone history yet (recording since Oct 12, 2026). Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Flat (type known only after C), Corrective pattern (upward), C in progress (2 of 3 guidelines) · B = 142% of A; C = 111% of A
Note: Flat type (regular, expanded, running) can only be decided once C is complete.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed weekly candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 2 in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · W2 = 67% of W1
Comparison: Rule and Elliott count agree: wave 2 in progress.
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (downward), Z in progress (3 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W1 can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed daily candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 3 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Nested combination, Corrective pattern (downward), Z in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 82% of W; Y = 121% of W; X = 88% of Y; Z = 51% of W–Y
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as countermove X in a correction.
Alternative (not drawn): Flat (running), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (1 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Nested: leg Y is itself a combination, its X is 42.4% (at most 88.7%).
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg X can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed 4-hour candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y complete (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 67% of W; Y = 94% of W
Alternative (not drawn): Flat (type known only after C), Corrective pattern (upward), C in progress (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg X, Y can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays above the end of B, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, type known only after C), C in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is below the end of B
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario and alternative: level (3 of 3 guidelines each, strong) – the simpler or clearer pattern counts as the main scenario. Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays above the start of wave 1, this applies: Upward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 2 in progress (pullback) – count then points to rising prices.
Invalid if the daily close is below the start of wave 1 (−6.1% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the alternative moves to the front: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z in progress – count points to falling prices, as long as the daily close stays below the end of the second X.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of the second X (+9.8% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (1 of 3, weak) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of the second X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Nested combination), Z in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of the second X (+9.8% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, running), C complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of C (+9.8% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays above the end of Y, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of Y
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, type known only after C), C in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of B
The price reached the buy zone (0 to −2.7% from its top) and last closed back above it. Rule trigger: after the touch a swing high forms, and a daily close is above it. If the price closes below the start of wave 1 (−6.1%), the setup is void. All percentages: distance from the top of the buy zone.
In the TradingView chart: Draw the buy zone in the chart with the Fibonacci tool (instructions next to the wave chart) or as two horizontal lines (tool “Horizontal Line”). If the price closes below the start of wave 1 (−6.1%), the setup is void – without an entry of the rule.
Exit with a gain
Buy zone – Rule trigger: candle close above the swing high
Exit at a loss
Watcher Target 1, Target 2 and stop for this zone – with distance in percent and reward/risk – are available from Watcher. Plans and pricing Percentages from the top of the buy zone (61.8%) – not a forecast.
Rule-based, long only, 4-hour candles. Not a forecast and not investment advice. Lesson: the buy zone in 4 minutes
Trane Technologies · Sector Industrials · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Feb 5, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025
18.6% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 57 of 100: higher than 57% of 192 peers (All). medium.
Rank 77 of 100: higher than 77% of 28 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 10.4%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
13.7% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 52 of 100: higher than 52% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 60 of 100: higher than 60% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 12.9%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
34.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 77 of 100: higher than 77% of 218 peers (All). strong.
Rank 61 of 100: higher than 61% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 26.3%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
13.6% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 82 of 100: higher than 82% of 238 peers (All). strong.
Rank 87 of 100: higher than 87% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 7.5%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
40.1% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 59 of 100: higher than 59% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 66 of 100: higher than 66% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 33.2%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
13.2% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 213 peers (All). medium.
Rank 61 of 100: higher than 61% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 10.5%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
2.8B USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+10.1% per year
Rank 56 of 100: higher than 56% of 230 peers (All). medium.
Rank 67 of 100: higher than 67% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +8.5%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+11.4% per year
Rank 51 of 100: higher than 51% of 217 peers (All). medium.
Rank 72 of 100: higher than 72% of 30 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +9.2%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+4.8% per year
Rank 35 of 100: higher than 35% of 157 peers (All). medium.
Rank 60 of 100: higher than 60% of 21 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +4.5%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
+20.2% per year
Rank 69 of 100: higher than 69% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 72 of 100: higher than 72% of 23 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +10.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+29.8% per year
Rank 85 of 100: higher than 85% of 146 peers (All). strong.
Rank 83 of 100: higher than 83% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +13.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+18.0% per year
Rank 81 of 100: higher than 81% of 140 peers (All). strong.
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +8.1%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
29% Fiscal year 2025
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+12.1% per year
Rank 65 of 100: higher than 65% of 118 peers (All). medium.
Rank 68 of 100: higher than 68% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +7.7%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
3.3x Fiscal year 2025
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
8 of 8 Fiscal year 2025
No rank: not all 9 criteria have data.
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.54 at fiscal year end
Rank 53 of 100: lower than 53% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 61 of 100: lower than 61% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 0.62
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
1.25 at fiscal year end
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 215 peers (All). medium.
Rank 53 of 100: higher than 53% of 33 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 1.22
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
−7.5% in 5 years
Rank 73 of 100: lower than 73% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 71 of 100: lower than 71% of 29 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: −5.4%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2025 (Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025): Revenue 21.3B USD · Net income 2.9B USD · Net margin 13.7%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 18.6 USD operating income and 13.7 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 21.3B USD | 100.0% |
| Operating income | 4.0B USD | 18.6% |
| Research & development | 347.6M USD | 1.6% |
| Remaining cost of revenue and operating expenses | 17.0B USD | 79.8% |
| Net income | 2.9B USD | 13.7% |
| Interest expense | 226.7M USD | 1.1% |
| Taxes | 705.9M USD | 3.3% |
| Other | 116.2M USD | 0.5% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from 12.3% to 18.6%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 13.3% to 34.0%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio rose in 5 years from 35.3% to 40.1%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio fell in 5 years from 1.59 to 1.25.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from 1.3B USD to 2.8B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count fell in 5 years by 7.5% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 2.12 USD to 3.76 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio fell in 5 years from 60.2% to 29.0%.
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 9.2B USD went back to shareholders, 62% of it through share repurchases. That is 90% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Trane Technologies next to 8 stocks of the sector Industrials we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN Eaton Corporation | 27.4B USD | +9.0% | 37.6% | – | 14.9% | 21.0% | 47.1% | 12.9% | 6/9 |
| WM Waste Management | 25.2B USD | +10.6% | 40.4% | 17.1% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 21.8% | 11.2% | 6/9 |
| MMM 3M | 24.9B USD | −5.0% | 39.9% | 18.6% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 5/9 |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 24.5B USD | +4.6% | – | 40.2% | 29.1% | 38.7% | 26.5% | 22.4% | – |
| JCI Johnson Controls | 23.6B USD | +1.1% | 36.4% | – | 13.9% | 25.5% | 34.1% | 9.0% | 6/9 |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing | 21.9B USD | +7.9% | 46.4% | – | 20.1% | 73.2% | 9.5% | 23.9% | 8/9 |
| PH Parker Hannifin | 21.5B USD | +8.4% | 37.7% | 23.6% | 17.0% | 23.7% | 49.9% | 18.2% | 9/9 |
| TT Trane Technologies this stock | 21.3B USD | +11.4% | – | 18.6% | 13.7% | 34.0% | 40.1% | 13.2% | – |
| EMR Emerson Electric | 18.0B USD | +1.4% | 52.8% | – | 12.7% | 11.3% | 48.3% | 14.8% | 6/9 |
| Median of the sector 34 symbols | 24.1B USD | +9.2% | 35.4% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 26.3% | 33.2% | 9.7% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 90 symbols in the Industrials sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+11.4% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +8.0% (82 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 11.4% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+8.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+27.8% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +10.0% (66 symbols)
per share: +29.8% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 27.8% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+10.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
13.7% last fiscal year
Sector Industrials: median 11.1% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 13.69 USD remained as profit – at least as much as the median company in the sector (11.1%). Five years ago the margin was 6.9%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.46 latest balance sheet
Sector Industrials: median 0.58 (77 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.46 USD of financial debt – no more than the median company in the sector (0.58). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
29% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Industrials: median 35% (65 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.29 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. The rest stays in the company. Median company in the sector: 35%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
10 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 10 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. There were no losses in this period.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 21.3B | 2.9B | 13.7% | 12.98 | 3.76 | 29% |
| 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 19.8B | 2.6B | 12.9% | 11.24 | 3.36 | 30% |
| 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 17.7B | 2.0B | 11.4% | 8.77 | 3.00 | 34% |
| 2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 16.0B | 1.8B | 11.0% | 7.48 | 2.68 | 36% |
| 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 14.1B | 1.4B | 10.1% | 5.87 | 2.36 | 40% |
| 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 12.5B | 854.9M | 6.9% | 3.52 | 2.12 | 60% |
| 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 16.6B | 1.4B | 8.5% | 5.77 | 2.12 | 37% |
| 2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 15.7B | 1.3B | 8.5% | 5.35 | 1.96 | 37% |
| 2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 14.2B | 1.3B | 9.2% | 5.05 | 1.70 | 34% |
| 2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 13.5B | 1.5B | 10.9% | 5.65 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26 | Jun 30, 2026 | 6.4B | 925.7M | 14.6% | 4.16 | 2.10 | 50% |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 5.0B | 584.4M | 11.8% | 2.62 | 1.05 | 40% |
| Q4/25* | Dec 31, 2025 | 5.1B | 591.3M | 11.5% | – | 0.94 | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 5.7B | 847.6M | 14.8% | 3.78 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Q2/25 | Jun 30, 2025 | 5.7B | 874.8M | 15.2% | 3.89 | 1.88 | 48% |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 4.7B | 604.9M | 12.9% | 2.67 | 0.94 | 35% |
| Q4/24* | Dec 31, 2024 | 4.9B | 604.3M | 12.4% | – | 0.84 | – |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 5.4B | 772.0M | 14.2% | 3.39 | 0.00 | 0% |
| Q2/24 | Jun 30, 2024 | 5.3B | 755.3M | 14.2% | 3.30 | 1.68 | 51% |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 4.2B | 436.3M | 10.3% | 1.90 | 0.84 | 44% |
| Q4/23* | Dec 31, 2023 | 4.4B | 504.3M | 11.4% | – | 0.75 | – |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 4.9B | 626.3M | 12.8% | 2.72 | 0.00 | 0% |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $43.9M2 people | −$43.9M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $46.2M3 people | −$46.2M |
| 12 months | $172.2K1 person | $75.9M5 people | −$75.7M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on TT yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules