Snap, based in California, runs the Snapchat app, through which mainly young people share photos, short videos and messages that disappear after viewing. Revenue comes mostly from advertising, plus the Snapchat+ subscription. Snap is also developing smart glasses. As of Oct 16, 2026
Snap is a technology company whose main product is the visual messaging app Snapchat. Users communicate there with friends and family through videos, voice, messages and augmented reality effects. Snaps delete by default to mimic real conversations. Through advertising products, brand and direct response advertisers reach users worldwide, for example with full-screen videos or augmented reality effects. Ads can be purchased and managed automatically through a self-service platform. Developers integrate Snap’s camera and effects technology into their own apps through tools such as Camera Kit.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Feb 5, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 17, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
Still above the buy zone
After a rise there is a buy zone; the price is still above it. “Near the buy zone” (from Watcher) shows how close it is.
As of: Close of the 4-hour candle Oct 27, 2026, 18:30 · Buy zone in the trade plan · An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) Already existing when added to the recording (added on Oct 19, 2026) · Setup confirmed on Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since it was added Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) No entry in the zone history yet (recording since Oct 12, 2026). Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (upward), C in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · B = 78% of A; C = 92% of A
Alternative (not drawn): Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 3 in progress (2 of 2 guidelines)
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed weekly candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (upward), Z in progress (4 of 4 guidelines) · X = 51% of W; Y = 67% of W; X = 86% of Y; Z = 93% of W–Y
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines)
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Flat (expanded), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (2 of 3 guidelines) · B = 102% of A; C = 190% of A
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (C).
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg B, C can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed 4-hour candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 2 in progress (1 of 3 guidelines) · W2 = 82% of W1
Comparison: Rule and Elliott count agree: wave 2 in progress.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed hourly candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 4 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 2, strong) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays above the end of B, this applies: sharp countermove upward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is below the end of B
If that breaks, the alternative moves to the front: Upward move in five waves (Impulse) – count points to rising prices, as long as the weekly close stays above the start of wave 1.
Invalid if the weekly close is below the start of wave 1
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (4 of 4 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (3 of 3, strong) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays above the end of the second X, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the daily close is below the end of the second X
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the daily close is below the end of X
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of C, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, expanded), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of C (+17.8% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 3 guidelines, weak) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays above the start of wave 1, this applies: Upward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 2 in progress (pullback) – count then points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the start of wave 1 (−4.5% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
The price is still above the buy zone (0 to −4.8% from its top) (61.8–78.6% of the wave 1 rise). Rule trigger: the daily low reaches the zone, then a swing high forms and a daily close is above it. Whether the price reaches the zone is open – if it rises above the wave 1 high first, the setup is void. All percentages: distance from the top of the buy zone.
In the TradingView chart: Draw the buy zone in the chart with the Fibonacci tool (instructions next to the wave chart) or as two horizontal lines (tool “Horizontal Line”). If the price closes below the start of wave 1 (−11.0%), the setup is void – without an entry of the rule.
Exit with a gain
Buy zone – Rule trigger: candle close above the swing high
Exit at a loss
Watcher Target 1, Target 2 and stop for this zone – with distance in percent and reward/risk – are available from Watcher. Plans and pricing Percentages from the top of the buy zone (61.8%) – not a forecast.
Rule-based, long only, 4-hour candles. Not a forecast and not investment advice. Lesson: the buy zone in 4 minutes
Snap · Sector Communication Services · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Feb 5, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025
55.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 58 of 100: higher than 58% of 153 peers (All). medium.
Rank 21 of 100: higher than 21% of 7 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 59.7%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
−9.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 15 of 100: higher than 15% of 192 peers (All). weak.
Rank 4 of 100: higher than 4% of 13 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 20.7%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
−7.8% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 14 of 100: higher than 14% of 237 peers (All). weak.
Rank 12 of 100: higher than 12% of 13 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 17.5%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
−20.2% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 9 of 100: higher than 9% of 218 peers (All). weak.
Rank 4 of 100: higher than 4% of 12 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 19.6%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
−6.0% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 12 of 100: higher than 12% of 238 peers (All). weak.
Rank 12 of 100: higher than 12% of 13 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 7.3%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
29.7% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 35 of 100: higher than 35% of 13 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Communication Services: 35.5%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
7.4% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 34 of 100: higher than 34% of 213 peers (All). medium.
Rank 13 of 100: higher than 13% of 12 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 17.9%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
437.2M USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+8.8% per year
Rank 51 of 100: higher than 51% of 230 peers (All). medium.
Rank 50 of 100: higher than 50% of 13 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Communication Services: +8.8%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+18.8% per year
Rank 73 of 100: higher than 73% of 217 peers (All). strong.
Rank 79 of 100: higher than 79% of 12 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Communication Services: +14.9%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+58.7% per year
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 95 of 100: higher than 95% of 10 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Communication Services: +14.5%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
5 of 8 Fiscal year 2025
No rank: not all 9 criteria have data.
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
1.55 at fiscal year end
Rank 19 of 100: lower than 19% of 199 peers (All). weak.
Rank 14 of 100: lower than 14% of 11 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: 0.96
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
3.56 at fiscal year end
Rank 86 of 100: higher than 86% of 215 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 13 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Communication Services: 1.19
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
+16.4% in 5 years
Rank 23 of 100: lower than 23% of 199 peers (All). weak.
Rank 25 of 100: lower than 25% of 10 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Communication Services: +0.1%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
Fiscal year 2025 (Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025): Revenue 5.9B USD · Net income −460.5M USD · Net margin −7.8%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 55.0 USD gross profit remained.
Operating loss: −9.0% of revenue
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 5.9B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 3.3B USD | 55.0% |
| Cost of revenue | 2.7B USD | 45.0% |
| Operating expenses | 3.8B USD | 64.0% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from −34.4% to −9.0%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet margin Margins above ±200% hidden (revenue very small relative to the result).Return on equity rose in 5 years from −40.6% to −20.2%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio fell in 5 years from 46.4% to 29.7%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases. Definition changes: some years use a different debt tag.The current ratio fell in 5 years from 5.00 to 3.56.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from −225.5M USD to 437.2M USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count rose in 5 years by 16.4% – more new shares were issued than repurchased (dilution).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
Over 5 years, 2.3B USD went back to shareholders, 100% of it through share repurchases. That is 232% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Snap next to 8 stocks of the sector Communication Services we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T AT&T | 125.6B USD | −6.1% | – | 19.2% | 17.5% | 17.4% | 30.1% | 15.5% | – |
| CMCSA Comcast | 123.7B USD | +3.6% | – | 16.7% | 16.2% | 20.6% | 35.5% | 17.7% | – |
| DIS Walt Disney Company (The) | 94.4B USD | +7.6% | – | 18.6% | 13.1% | 11.3% | 55.6% | 10.7% | – |
| TMUS T-Mobile US | 88.3B USD | +5.2% | – | 20.7% | 12.4% | 18.6% | 27.0% | 20.4% | – |
| NFLX Netflix | 45.2B USD | +12.6% | 48.5% | 29.5% | 24.3% | 41.3% | 47.9% | 20.9% | 7/9 |
| SNAP Snap this stock | 5.9B USD | +18.8% | 55.0% | −9.0% | −7.8% | −20.2% | 29.7% | 7.4% | – |
| APP AppLovin | 5.5B USD | +30.4% | 87.9% | 75.8% | 60.8% | 156.2% | 29.4% | – | 9/9 |
| AMC AMC Entertainment | 4.8B USD | +31.3% | – | −0.4% | −13.0% | – | −23.6% | −7.5% | – |
| RDDT Reddit | 2.2B USD | – | 91.2% | 20.1% | 24.1% | 18.1% | 90.4% | 31.1% | – |
| Median of the sector 12 symbols | 91.4B USD | +12.6% | 70.8% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 18.6% | 32.8% | 17.7% | – |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 24 symbols in the Communication Services sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+18.8% per year, last 5 years
Sector Communication Services: median +6.7% (22 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 18.8% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+6.7%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
– per year, last 5 years
Sector Communication Services: median +12.7% (12 symbols)
per share: not computable (loss in the first or last year)
What does this mean? There was a loss in the first or last year. An annual growth rate cannot be calculated meaningfully then.
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
−7.8% last fiscal year
Sector Communication Services: median 10.1% (24 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue there was no profit but a loss of 7.76 USD. Five years ago the margin was −37.7%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
1.83 latest balance sheet
Sector Communication Services: median 0.84 (22 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 1.83 USD of financial debt – more than twice as much as the median company in the sector (0.84). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
– Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Communication Services: median 24% (7 symbols)
What does this mean? The loaded SEC filings of the last two fiscal years contain no dividend per share. Either the company pays none, or it reports it under a different tag.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
0 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 0 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. 10 years ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 5.9B | −460.5M | −7.8% | −0.27 | – | – |
| 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 5.4B | −697.9M | −13.0% | −0.42 | – | – |
| 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 4.6B | −1.3B | −28.7% | −0.82 | – | – |
| 2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 4.6B | −1.4B | −31.1% | −0.89 | – | – |
| 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 4.1B | −488.0M | −11.9% | −0.31 | – | – |
| 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 2.5B | −944.8M | −37.7% | −0.65 | – | – |
| 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 1.7B | −1.0B | −60.3% | −0.75 | – | – |
| 2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 1.2B | −1.3B | −106.4% | −0.97 | – | – |
| 2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 824.9M | −3.4B | −417.6% | −2.95 | – | – |
| 2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 404.5M | −514.6M | −127.2% | −0.64 | – | – |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26 | Jun 30, 2026 | 1.6B | −164.0M | −10.3% | −0.10 | – | – |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 1.5B | −89.0M | −5.8% | −0.05 | – | – |
| Q4/25* | Dec 31, 2025 | 1.7B | 45.2M | 2.6% | – | – | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 1.5B | −103.5M | −6.9% | −0.06 | – | – |
| Q2/25 | Jun 30, 2025 | 1.3B | −262.6M | −19.5% | −0.16 | – | – |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 1.4B | −139.6M | −10.2% | −0.08 | – | – |
| Q4/24* | Dec 31, 2024 | 1.6B | 9.1M | 0.6% | – | – | – |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 1.4B | −153.2M | −11.2% | −0.09 | – | – |
| Q2/24 | Jun 30, 2024 | 1.2B | −248.6M | −20.1% | −0.15 | – | – |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 1.2B | −305.1M | −25.5% | −0.19 | – | – |
| Q4/23* | Dec 31, 2023 | 1.4B | −248.2M | −18.2% | – | – | – |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 1.2B | −368.3M | −31.0% | −0.23 | – | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $24.2M6 people | −$24.2M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $50.7M6 people | −$50.7M |
| 12 months | $00 people | $110.7M9 people | −$110.7M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on SNAP yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules