KLA is a US equipment supplier to the semiconductor industry. The company provides inspection and metrology systems that chipmakers use to find defects on wafers and masks and to control their production. Important customers are in Taiwan, South Korea, China and the US. As of Oct 11, 2026
KLA supplies process control solutions for manufacturing wafers, masks, chips, chip packages and circuit boards. It was formed in 1997 as KLA-Tencor through the merger of KLA Instruments and Tencor Instruments. The Semiconductor Process Control segment offers inspection and metrology technology and software that help makers of chips, wafers and masks reach their target yield. The Specialty Semiconductor Process segment supplies equipment for vacuum deposition and etching, for example for MEMS, radio frequency chips and power semiconductors. The PCB and Component Inspection segment supplies technology with which electronics makers inspect and measure circuit boards, substrates and packaged chips. Revenue comes mainly from product sales and service contracts, mostly through its own direct sales force.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Aug 6, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) No active buy zone – the last one ended on Oct 16, 2026 · Setup invalid (close below the start of wave 1) Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) No active buy zone – the last one ended in the Week from Oct 19, 2026 · Setup invalid (close below the start of wave 1) Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (1 of 2 guidelines) · B = 43% of A; C = 163% of A
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg C can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed weekly candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 88% of W; Y = 131% of W
Alternative (not drawn): Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (downward), C in progress (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Flat (expanded), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (2 of 3 guidelines) · B = 105% of A; C = 180% of A
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg C can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Structure open: leg A cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse (W3 extended), Impulse pattern (downward), Wave 4 in progress (4 of 4 guidelines) · W2 = 63% of W1; W3 = 326% of W1
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y complete (2 of 3 guidelines)
Note: W3 extended.
Note: Alternation of W2 and W4 not checked.
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W1, W3 can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Structure open: leg W2 cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed hourly candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 2 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of C, this applies: sharp countermove upward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of C
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of X
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: sharp countermove downward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of B
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (2 of 3 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: A.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of C, this applies: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, expanded), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of C
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (4 of 4 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: W2.
As long as the hourly close stays below the end of wave 1, this applies: Downward move in five waves (Impulse, W3 extended), wave 4 in progress (pullback) – count then points to falling prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is above the end of wave 1
If that breaks, the alternative moves to the front: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to rising prices, as long as the hourly close stays above the end of Y.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of Y
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
KLA Corporation · Sector Technology · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Aug 6, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Jun 30, 2026
61.3% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 66 of 100: higher than 66% of 153 peers (All). medium.
Rank 55 of 100: higher than 55% of 57 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 56.1%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
35.6% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 91 of 100: higher than 91% of 237 peers (All). strong.
Rank 85 of 100: higher than 85% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 12.5%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
76.1% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 94 of 100: higher than 94% of 218 peers (All). strong.
Rank 89 of 100: higher than 89% of 61 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 13.5%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
26.9% Fiscal year 2026 (total assets at year end)
Rank 95 of 100: higher than 95% of 238 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 5.9%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
35.4% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 48 of 100: higher than 48% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 26 of 100: higher than 26% of 63 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 51.6%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
27.7% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 81 of 100: higher than 81% of 213 peers (All). strong.
Rank 70 of 100: higher than 70% of 62 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 19.0%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
3.8B USD Fiscal year 2026
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+9.0% per year
Rank 52 of 100: higher than 52% of 230 peers (All). medium.
Rank 33 of 100: higher than 33% of 59 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +14.3%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+14.4% per year
Rank 62 of 100: higher than 62% of 217 peers (All). medium.
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 54 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +14.5%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+16.4% per year
Rank 82 of 100: higher than 82% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 64 of 100: higher than 64% of 37 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +12.4%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
+14.9% per year
Rank 58 of 100: higher than 58% of 157 peers (All). medium.
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +19.2%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+22.3% per year
Rank 73 of 100: higher than 73% of 146 peers (All). strong.
Rank 66 of 100: higher than 66% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +17.0%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+23.3% per year
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 140 peers (All). strong.
Rank 65 of 100: higher than 65% of 27 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +17.5%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
22% Fiscal year 2026
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+17.3% per year
Rank 83 of 100: higher than 83% of 118 peers (All). strong.
Rank 83 of 100: higher than 83% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +11.2%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
3.6x Fiscal year 2026
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
8 of 9 Fiscal year 2026
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 134 peers (All). strong.
Rank 92 of 100: higher than 92% of 44 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.93 at fiscal year end
Rank 36 of 100: lower than 36% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 29 of 100: lower than 29% of 54 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 0.41
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
2.88 at fiscal year end
Rank 81 of 100: higher than 81% of 215 peers (All). strong.
Rank 71 of 100: higher than 71% of 63 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: 2.02
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
−15.1% in 5 years
Rank 92 of 100: lower than 92% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 99 of 100: lower than 99% of 51 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +2.8%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2026 (Jul 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026): Revenue 13.6B USD · Net income 4.8B USD · Net margin 35.6%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 61.3 USD gross profit and 35.6 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 13.6B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 8.3B USD | 61.3% |
| Cost of revenue | 5.3B USD | 38.7% |
| Net income | 4.8B USD | 35.6% |
| Research & development | 1.5B USD | 11.3% |
| Interest expense | 284.4M USD | 2.1% |
| Taxes | 775.2M USD | 5.7% |
| Remaining costs & other | 901.9M USD | 6.6% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The net margin rose in 5 years from 30.0% to 35.6%.
Gross marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 61.5% to 76.1%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio rose in 5 years from 32.9% to 35.4%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio rose in 5 years from 2.71 to 2.88.
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from 2.0B USD to 3.8B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count fell in 5 years by 15.1% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 0.36 USD to 0.80 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio fell in 5 years from 26.9% to 21.9%.
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 15.6B USD went back to shareholders, 74% of it through share repurchases. That is 92% of the free cash flow of those years. This was offset by new shares issued for 702.9M USD (including employee plans).
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
KLA Corporation next to 8 stocks of the sector Technology we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXN Texas Instruments | 17.7B USD | +4.1% | 57.0% | 34.1% | 28.3% | 30.7% | 47.1% | 14.7% | 6/9 |
| GLW Corning Inc. | 15.6B USD | +6.7% | 36.0% | 14.6% | 10.2% | 13.5% | 38.1% | 9.0% | 7/9 |
| KLAC KLA Corporation this stock | 13.6B USD | +14.4% | 61.3% | – | 35.6% | 76.1% | 35.4% | 27.7% | 8/9 |
| NOW ServiceNow | 13.3B USD | +24.1% | 77.5% | 13.7% | 13.2% | 13.5% | 49.8% | 34.5% | 6/9 |
| WDC Western Digital | 12.9B USD | −5.3% | 48.9% | 34.5% | 72.9% | 106.3% | 63.9% | 27.2% | 7/9 |
| STX Seagate Technology | 12.2B USD | +2.7% | 45.6% | 33.6% | 26.1% | 146.9% | 21.7% | 25.5% | 8/9 |
| MSI Motorola Solutions | 11.7B USD | +9.5% | 51.7% | 25.6% | 18.4% | 89.4% | 12.4% | 22.0% | 6/9 |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 11.5B USD | +22.0% | 70.4% | 6.1% | 2.7% | 1.1% | 56.7% | 35.8% | 4/9 |
| ADI Analog Devices | 11.0B USD | +14.5% | 61.5% | 26.6% | 20.6% | 6.7% | 70.5% | 38.8% | 8/9 |
| Median of the sector 63 symbols | 11.0B USD | +14.5% | 56.1% | 14.2% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 51.6% | 19.0% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 97 symbols in the Technology sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+14.4% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.5% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 14.4% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.5%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+18.4% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.3% (62 symbols)
per share: +22.3% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 18.4% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.3%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
35.6% last fiscal year
Sector Technology: median 12.5% (97 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 35.57 USD remained as profit – at least as much as the median company in the sector (12.5%). Five years ago the margin was 30.0%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.93 latest balance sheet
Sector Technology: median 0.45 (79 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.93 USD of financial debt – more than twice as much as the median company in the sector (0.45). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
22% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Technology: median 30% (36 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.22 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. The rest stays in the company. Median company in the sector: 30%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
10 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 10 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. There were no losses in this period.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | 13.6B | 4.8B | 35.6% | 3.66 | 0.80 | 22% |
| 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 | 12.2B | 4.1B | 33.4% | 3.04 | 0.68 | 22% |
| 2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | 9.8B | 2.8B | 28.1% | 2.03 | 0.57 | 28% |
| 2023 | Jun 30, 2023 | 10.5B | 3.4B | 32.3% | 2.42 | 0.52 | 22% |
| 2022 | Jun 30, 2022 | 9.2B | 3.3B | 36.1% | 2.19 | 0.42 | 19% |
| 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | 6.9B | 2.1B | 30.0% | 1.34 | 0.36 | 27% |
| 2020 | Jun 30, 2020 | 5.8B | 1.2B | 21.0% | 0.77 | 0.33 | 43% |
| 2019 | Jun 30, 2019 | 4.6B | 1.2B | 25.7% | 0.75 | 0.30 | 40% |
| 2018 | Jun 30, 2018 | 4.0B | 802.3M | 19.9% | 0.51 | 0.25 | 49% |
| 2017 | Jun 30, 2017 | 3.5B | 926.1M | 26.6% | 0.59 | 0.21 | 36% |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26* | Jun 30, 2026 | 3.7B | 1.4B | 37.3% | – | – | – |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 3.4B | 1.2B | 35.2% | – | – | – |
| Q4/25 | Dec 31, 2025 | 3.3B | 1.1B | 34.7% | – | – | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 3.2B | 1.1B | 34.9% | – | – | – |
| Q2/25* | Jun 30, 2025 | 3.2B | 1.2B | 37.9% | – | – | – |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 3.1B | 1.1B | 35.5% | 0.82 | 0.17 | 21% |
| Q4/24 | Dec 31, 2024 | 3.1B | 824.5M | 26.8% | 0.62 | 0.17 | 28% |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 2.8B | 945.9M | 33.3% | 0.70 | 0.15 | 21% |
| Q2/24* | Jun 30, 2024 | 2.6B | 836.4M | 32.6% | – | – | – |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 2.4B | 601.5M | 25.5% | 0.44 | 0.15 | 33% |
| Q4/23 | Dec 31, 2023 | 2.5B | 582.5M | 23.4% | 0.43 | 0.15 | 34% |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 2.4B | 741.4M | 30.9% | 0.54 | 0.13 | 24% |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Per-share values adjusted for stock split Stock splitA company divides each share into several new ones; the value of the company stays the same. We convert per-share values from before the split to today’s scale.Example: Split 4 : 1, earnings per share before $11.89 → comparable today $2.97.More in the Academy: Lesson revenue, profit and margin 10:1 (between Aug 8, 2025 and Aug 6, 2026). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $65.4M6 people | −$65.4M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $96.5M7 people | −$96.5M |
| 12 months | $00 people | $112.3M7 people | −$112.3M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on KLAC yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules