Enphase Energy, based in California, develops microinverters that convert the direct current of individual solar panels into grid power. It also offers battery storage, chargers for electric cars and software for controlling the system. Customers are mainly homeowners, reached through installers. As of Oct 16, 2026
Enphase Energy is a global energy technology company founded in March 2006. It develops, manufactures and sells home energy systems that combine power generation, storage and control on one platform. Its core is microinverters that convert the power at each individual solar panel; in addition there are batteries, load controllers and chargers for electric cars. Customers are mainly solar distributors that supply installers; Enphase also supplies large installers, equipment makers and strategic partners directly. A single customer accounted for a large share of revenue in 2025, and most of the revenue came from the United States. The company has some of its products assembled and tested by contract manufacturers such as Flex, Salcomp and Sunwoda.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Feb 17, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 17, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
New buy zone
A new buy zone has just formed for this symbol (valid since Oct 27, 2026). With Watcher you see it right away – with buy zone, targets and stop; for you it becomes visible on Oct 29, 2026.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) Zone valid since Oct 27, 2026 · unchanged since then Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) Already existing when added to the recording (added in the Week from Oct 12, 2026) · Setup confirmed on Jun 1, 2026 · unchanged since it was added Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (1 of 2 guidelines) · B = 79% of A; C = 126% of A
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (C).
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg A, B can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed weekly candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 2 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices. Fibonacci measured logarithmically (weekly candles).
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (downward), Z in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 41% of W; Y = 62% of W; X = 77% of Y; Z = 33% of W–Y
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (2 of 2 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
On 4-hour candles the rule currently has no setup, and the Elliott count finds no count that follows the rules – so there is no analysis chart. The chart is recalculated every hour.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 2 in progress (1 of 3 guidelines) · W2 = 84% of W1
Comparison: Rule and Elliott count agree: wave 2 in progress.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed hourly candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 4 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 2 guidelines, medium) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of C, this applies: sharp countermove upward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of C (+74.7% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 2, strong) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
As long as the daily close stays below the end of the second X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of the second X
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of X
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario and alternative: level (3 of 3 guidelines each, strong) – the simpler or clearer pattern counts as the main scenario. Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: B.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of B, this applies: sharp countermove downward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of B
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Double zigzag W-X-Y), Y in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of X
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 3 guidelines, weak) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays above the start of wave 1, this applies: Upward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 2 in progress (pullback) – count then points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the start of wave 1 (−5.5% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Enphase Energy · Sector Technology · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Feb 17, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Dec 31, 2025
46.6% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 153 peers (All). medium.
Rank 34 of 100: higher than 34% of 57 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 56.1%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
10.7% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 40 of 100: higher than 40% of 192 peers (All). medium.
Rank 46 of 100: higher than 46% of 60 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 14.2%
Operating income divided by revenue: what the core business earns before interest and taxes.
11.7% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 12.5%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
15.8% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 48 of 100: higher than 48% of 218 peers (All). medium.
Rank 53 of 100: higher than 53% of 61 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 13.5%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
4.9% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 44 of 100: higher than 44% of 238 peers (All). medium.
Rank 45 of 100: higher than 45% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 5.9%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
31.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 44 of 100: higher than 44% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 23 of 100: higher than 23% of 63 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 51.6%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
6.5% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 30 of 100: higher than 30% of 213 peers (All). weak.
Rank 35 of 100: higher than 35% of 62 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 19.0%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
95.9M USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
−14.2% per year
Rank 4 of 100: higher than 4% of 230 peers (All). weak.
Rank 4 of 100: higher than 4% of 59 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +14.3%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+13.7% per year
Rank 60 of 100: higher than 60% of 217 peers (All). medium.
Rank 40 of 100: higher than 40% of 54 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +14.5%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+15.2% per year
Rank 81 of 100: higher than 81% of 157 peers (All). strong.
Rank 61 of 100: higher than 61% of 37 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: +12.4%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
−22.5% per year
Rank 8 of 100: higher than 8% of 157 peers (All). weak.
Rank 8 of 100: higher than 8% of 32 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +19.2%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+6.3% per year
Rank 24 of 100: higher than 24% of 146 peers (All). weak.
Rank 16 of 100: higher than 16% of 34 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: +17.0%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
6 of 9 Fiscal year 2025
Rank 45 of 100: higher than 45% of 134 peers (All). medium.
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 44 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
1.11 at fiscal year end
Rank 29 of 100: lower than 29% of 199 peers (All). weak.
Rank 23 of 100: lower than 23% of 54 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Technology: 0.41
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
2.07 at fiscal year end
Rank 70 of 100: higher than 70% of 215 peers (All). strong.
Rank 52 of 100: higher than 52% of 63 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Technology: 2.02
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
−5.0% in 5 years
Rank 62 of 100: lower than 62% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 81 of 100: lower than 81% of 51 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Technology: +2.8%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
No reported values for “Dividend per share” in this interval.
Fiscal year 2025 (Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2025): Revenue 1.5B USD · Net income 172.1M USD · Net margin 11.7%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 46.6 USD gross profit, 10.7 USD operating income and 11.7 USD net income remained.
Net income is above operating income (e.g. a tax benefit, gains on investments or securities).
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1.5B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 687.0M USD | 46.6% |
| Cost of revenue | 786.0M USD | 53.4% |
| Operating income | 157.5M USD | 10.7% |
| Research & development | 189.1M USD | 12.8% |
| Other operating expenses | 340.4M USD | 23.1% |
| Net income | 172.1M USD | 11.7% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin fell in 5 years from 24.1% to 10.7%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity fell in 5 years from 27.7% to 15.8%.
Return on equityReturn on assets Return on equity hidden where equity is below 5% of total assets.The equity ratio fell in 5 years from 40.3% to 31.0%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio rose in 5 years from 1.75 to 2.07.
Current ratioFree cash flow fell in 5 years from 195.8M USD to 95.9M USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count fell in 5 years by 5.0% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
Over 5 years, 1.4B USD went back to shareholders, 100% of it through share repurchases. That is 66% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Enphase Energy next to 8 stocks of the sector Technology we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDOG Datadog | 3.4B USD | +41.5% | 80.0% | −1.3% | 3.1% | 2.9% | 56.2% | 29.2% | 5/9 |
| LITE Lumentum | 3.0B USD | +11.6% | 41.7% | 17.4% | −230.1% | −149.3% | 63.5% | 10.0% | 5/9 |
| NET Cloudflare | 2.2B USD | +38.1% | 74.5% | −9.6% | −4.7% | −7.0% | 24.2% | 13.3% | 4/9 |
| ENPH Enphase Energy this stock | 1.5B USD | +13.7% | 46.6% | 10.7% | 11.7% | 15.8% | 31.0% | 6.5% | 6/9 |
| CRDO Credo Technology Group | 1.3B USD | +86.8% | 68.0% | 33.3% | 35.4% | 22.9% | 89.9% | 30.5% | – |
| MARA MARA Holdings | 907.1M USD | +190.9% | – | −135.0% | −144.6% | −37.8% | 47.6% | −133.4% | – |
| TE T1 Energy | 755.3M USD | – | 7.4% | −31.1% | −48.7% | −146.9% | 18.2% | 2.2% | 6/9 |
| IREN IREN | 707.0M USD | +145.7% | 68.9% | −148.0% | −99.4% | −16.8% | 26.5% | −127.0% | 3/9 |
| RIOT Riot Platforms | 647.4M USD | +121.7% | – | −96.1% | −102.4% | −23.2% | 72.6% | −119.6% | – |
| Median of the sector 63 symbols | 11.0B USD | +14.5% | 56.1% | 14.2% | 12.5% | 13.5% | 51.6% | 19.0% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 97 symbols in the Technology sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+13.7% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.5% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 13.7% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+13.5%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+5.1% per year, last 5 years
Sector Technology: median +13.3% (62 symbols)
per share: +6.3% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 5.1% per year on average, but more slowly than the median company in the sector (+13.3%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
11.7% last fiscal year
Sector Technology: median 12.5% (97 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 11.69 USD remained as profit – less than the median company in the sector (12.5%). Five years ago the margin was 17.3%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.46 latest balance sheet
Sector Technology: median 0.45 (79 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.46 USD of financial debt – more than the median company in the sector (0.45). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
– Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Technology: median 30% (36 symbols)
What does this mean? The loaded SEC filings of the last two fiscal years contain no dividend per share. Either the company pays none, or it reports it under a different tag.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
7 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 7 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. 3 years ended with a loss.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dec 31, 2025 | 1.5B | 172.1M | 11.7% | 1.29 | – | – |
| 2024 | Dec 31, 2024 | 1.3B | 102.7M | 7.7% | 0.75 | – | – |
| 2023 | Dec 31, 2023 | 2.3B | 438.9M | 19.2% | 3.08 | – | – |
| 2022 | Dec 31, 2022 | 2.3B | 397.4M | 17.0% | 2.77 | – | – |
| 2021 | Dec 31, 2021 | 1.4B | 145.4M | 10.5% | 1.02 | – | – |
| 2020 | Dec 31, 2020 | 774.4M | 134.0M | 17.3% | 0.95 | – | – |
| 2019 | Dec 31, 2019 | 624.3M | 161.1M | 25.8% | 1.23 | – | – |
| 2018 | Dec 31, 2018 | 316.2M | −11.6M | −3.7% | −0.12 | – | – |
| 2017 | Dec 31, 2017 | 286.2M | −45.2M | −15.8% | −0.54 | – | – |
| 2016 | Dec 31, 2016 | 322.6M | −67.5M | −20.9% | – | – | – |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3/26 | Sep 30, 2026 | 293.3M | 23.4M | 8.0% | 0.17 | – | – |
| Q2/26 | Jun 30, 2026 | 291.9M | 36.1M | 12.4% | 0.27 | – | – |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 282.9M | −7.4M | −2.6% | −0.06 | – | – |
| Q4/25* | Dec 31, 2025 | 343.3M | 38.7M | 11.3% | – | – | – |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 410.4M | 66.6M | 16.2% | 0.50 | – | – |
| Q2/25 | Jun 30, 2025 | 363.2M | 37.1M | 10.2% | 0.28 | – | – |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 356.1M | 29.7M | 8.3% | 0.22 | – | – |
| Q4/24* | Dec 31, 2024 | 382.7M | 62.2M | 16.2% | – | – | – |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 380.9M | 45.8M | 12.0% | 0.33 | – | – |
| Q2/24 | Jun 30, 2024 | 303.5M | 10.8M | 3.6% | 0.08 | – | – |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 263.3M | −16.1M | −6.1% | −0.12 | – | – |
| Q4/23* | Dec 31, 2023 | 302.6M | 20.9M | 6.9% | – | – | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $134.1K1 person | −$134.1K |
| 6 months | $391.4K2 people | $211.5K1 person | +$179.9K |
| 12 months | $1.1M2 people | $10.8M3 people | −$9.7M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on ENPH yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules