Deere & Company makes farm machinery such as tractors, combines and planters under the John Deere brand. It also makes construction and forestry equipment and lawn tractors and has a financing division. GPS guidance and software for precision agriculture are increasingly important. As of Oct 13, 2026
John Deere makes agricultural, turf, construction and forestry machinery and offers financing for it. The Production & Precision Agriculture segment comprises row crop tractors, harvesters, cotton and sugarcane harvesters as well as tillage and seeding equipment. The Small Agriculture & Turf segment offers compact and utility tractors, riding mowers, utility vehicles and golf course equipment. The Construction & Forestry segment supplies backhoe loaders, excavators, wheel loaders, timber harvesting equipment and road building equipment. The financial services division mainly finances end customers who purchase new machines of the group from dealers, as well as dealer inventories. Precision technology comes factory-installed in the machines or can be retrofitted through the dealer network.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Dec 18, 2025) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 27, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
No buy zone
There is currently no buy zone for this symbol under our Elliott rule. One only forms when the price pulls back after a strong rise.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) No active buy zone – the last one ended on Oct 19, 2026 · Buy zone no longer valid Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) Zone known when recording started (recording since Oct 12, 2026) · Setup confirmed on Oct 5, 2026 · last changed in the Week from Oct 12, 2026 Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (upward), Z complete (4 of 4 guidelines) · X = 75% of W; Y = 160% of W; X = 61% of Y; Z = 66% of W–Y
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (Z).
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y complete (3 of 3 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W, Y, Z can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed weekly candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 2 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices. Fibonacci measured logarithmically (weekly candles).
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Impulse, Impulse pattern (upward), Wave 2 in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · W2 = 73% of W1
Comparison: Rule and Elliott count agree: wave 2 in progress.
Alternative (not drawn): Flat (regular), Corrective pattern (upward), C complete (2 of 3 guidelines)
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed daily candles; the chart is recalculated every day. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 3 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026
Elliott count: Double zigzag (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (downward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 63% of W; Y = 97% of W
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Structure open: leg X cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed 4-hour candles (recalculated every hour). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y in progress (2 of 2 guidelines) · X = 80% of W; Y = 66% of W
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the first leg W of a correction.
Alternative (not drawn): Combination (W-X-Y-X-Z), Corrective pattern (downward), Z complete (3 of 4 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg W can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed hourly candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 4 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (4 of 4 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (3 of 3, strong) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays below the end of Z, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of Z (+23.1% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the weekly close is above the end of Y (+23.1% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (2 of 3, medium) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays above the start of wave 1, this applies: Upward move in five waves (Impulse), wave 2 in progress (pullback) – count then points to rising prices.
Invalid if the daily close is below the start of wave 1 (−8.6% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the alternative moves to the front: flat countermove upward in three waves (Flat, regular), C complete – count points to falling prices, as long as the daily close stays below the end of C.
Invalid if the daily close is above the end of C (+13.8% from the top of the zone)
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
provisional count The inner sub-waves cannot be seen on this timeframe – the hard Elliott rules are met, the internal structure remains open. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: X.
As long as the 4-hour close stays below the end of X, this applies: complex countermove downward (Double zigzag W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the 4-hour close is above the end of X
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario: ahead (2 of 2 guidelines, strong) · Alternative: behind (3 of 4, strong) Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the hourly close stays above the end of X, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of X (−1.2% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove downward (Combination W-X-Y-X-Z), Z complete – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the hourly close is below the end of Z (−1.2% from the top of the zone)
Deere & Company · Sector Industrials · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Dec 18, 2025.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Nov 2, 2025
11.0% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 41 of 100: higher than 41% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 12.9%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
19.4% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 55 of 100: higher than 55% of 218 peers (All). medium.
Rank 30 of 100: higher than 30% of 32 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: 26.3%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
4.7% Fiscal year 2025 (total assets at year end)
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 238 peers (All). medium.
Rank 31 of 100: higher than 31% of 34 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: 7.5%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
24.5% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 33 of 100: higher than 33% of 239 peers (All). medium.
Rank 40 of 100: higher than 40% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 33.2%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
13.4% Fiscal year 2025
Rank 49 of 100: higher than 49% of 213 peers (All). medium.
Rank 67 of 100: higher than 67% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 10.5%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
6.1B USD Fiscal year 2025
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
−4.6% per year
Rank 9 of 100: higher than 9% of 230 peers (All). weak.
Rank 8 of 100: higher than 8% of 32 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: +8.5%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+5.2% per year
Rank 21 of 100: higher than 21% of 217 peers (All). weak.
Rank 28 of 100: higher than 28% of 30 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: +9.2%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
−7.4% per year
Rank 18 of 100: higher than 18% of 157 peers (All). weak.
Rank 20 of 100: higher than 20% of 23 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: +10.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+16.3% per year
Rank 58 of 100: higher than 58% of 146 peers (All). medium.
Rank 60 of 100: higher than 60% of 21 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +13.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
35% Fiscal year 2025
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+16.3% per year
Rank 83 of 100: higher than 83% of 118 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +7.7%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
3.5x Fiscal year 2025
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
−14.2% in 5 years
Rank 90 of 100: lower than 90% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 91 of 100: lower than 91% of 29 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: −5.4%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2025 (Oct 28, 2024 – Nov 2, 2025): Revenue 45.7B USD · Net income 5.0B USD · Net margin 11.0%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 11.0 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 45.7B USD | 100.0% |
| Net income | 5.0B USD | 11.0% |
| Research & development | 2.3B USD | 5.1% |
| Interest expense | 3.2B USD | 6.9% |
| Taxes | 1.3B USD | 2.8% |
| Remaining costs & other | 33.9B USD | 74.2% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The operating margin rose in 5 years from 11.2% to 17.5%.
Gross marginOperating marginNet marginReturn on equity fell in 5 years from 21.3% to 19.4%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio rose in 5 years from 17.2% to 24.5%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The share count fell in 5 years by 14.2% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countBanks and insurers: gross margin, current assets and capital expenditure are usually not reported and cash flow is not meaningful there – those lines and charts are omitted.
From annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 3.04 USD to 6.48 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio stayed roughly the same in 5 years (35.0%).
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 25.6B USD went back to shareholders, 72% of it through share repurchases. That is 82% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDFor banks and insurers free cash flow is not meaningful; ratios to free cash flow are usually omitted.
Dividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Deere & Company next to 8 stocks of the sector Industrials we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAT Caterpillar Inc. | 67.6B USD | +10.1% | 33.8% | 16.5% | 13.1% | 41.7% | 21.6% | 13.2% | 7/9 |
| UAL United Airlines Holdings | 59.1B USD | +30.9% | – | 8.0% | 5.7% | 21.9% | 20.0% | 4.3% | – |
| GD General Dynamics | 52.6B USD | +6.7% | – | 10.2% | 8.0% | 16.4% | 44.8% | 7.5% | – |
| UBER Uber | 52.0B USD | +36.1% | 39.8% | 10.7% | 19.3% | 37.2% | 43.8% | 18.8% | 6/9 |
| GE GE Aerospace | 45.9B USD | −10.4% | – | – | 19.0% | 46.6% | 14.3% | 15.8% | – |
| DE Deere & Company this stock | 45.7B USD | +5.2% | – | – | 11.0% | 19.4% | 24.5% | – | – |
| GEV GE Vernova | 38.1B USD | – | 19.8% | 3.6% | 12.8% | 43.7% | 17.7% | 9.7% | – |
| CMI Cummins | 33.7B USD | +11.2% | 25.3% | 12.0% | 8.4% | 23.0% | 36.3% | 7.1% | 7/9 |
| PWR Quanta Services | 28.5B USD | +20.5% | 15.0% | 5.7% | 3.6% | 11.5% | 35.9% | 5.7% | 5/9 |
| Median of the sector 34 symbols | 24.1B USD | +9.2% | 35.4% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 26.3% | 33.2% | 9.7% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Banks and insurers: gross margin (only if reported), free cash flow margin and Piotroski are not meaningful there (“–”).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 90 symbols in the Industrials sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+5.2% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +8.0% (82 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 5.2% per year on average, but more slowly than the median company in the sector (+8.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+12.8% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +10.0% (66 symbols)
per share: +16.3% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 12.8% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+10.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
11.0% last fiscal year
Sector Industrials: median 11.1% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 11.00 USD remained as profit – less than the median company in the sector (11.1%). Five years ago the margin was 7.7%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
– latest balance sheet
Sector Industrials: median 0.58 (77 symbols)
What does this mean? No usable figure: reported financial debt or positive equity for the same balance sheet date is missing.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
35% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Industrials: median 35% (65 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.35 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. The rest stays in the company. Median company in the sector: 35%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
10 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 10 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. There were no losses in this period.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Nov 2, 2025 | 45.7B | 5.0B | 11.0% | 18.50 | 6.48 | 35% |
| 2024 | Oct 27, 2024 | 51.7B | 7.1B | 13.7% | 25.62 | 5.88 | 23% |
| 2023 | Oct 29, 2023 | 61.3B | 10.2B | 16.6% | 34.63 | 5.05 | 15% |
| 2022 | Oct 30, 2022 | 52.6B | 7.1B | 13.6% | 23.28 | 4.36 | 19% |
| 2021 | Oct 31, 2021 | 44.0B | 6.0B | 13.5% | 18.99 | 3.61 | 19% |
| 2020 | Nov 1, 2020 | 35.5B | 2.8B | 7.7% | 8.69 | 3.04 | 35% |
| 2019 | Nov 3, 2019 | 39.3B | 3.3B | 8.3% | 10.15 | 3.04 | 30% |
| 2018 | Oct 28, 2018 | 37.4B | 2.4B | 6.3% | 7.24 | 2.58 | 36% |
| 2017 | Oct 29, 2017 | 29.7B | 2.2B | 7.3% | 6.68 | 2.40 | 36% |
| 2016 | Oct 31, 2016 | 26.6B | 1.5B | 5.7% | 4.81 | 2.40 | 50% |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3/26 | Aug 2, 2026 | 12.6B | 1.4B | 10.9% | 5.10 | 1.62 | 32% |
| Q2/26 | May 3, 2026 | 13.4B | 1.8B | 13.3% | 6.55 | 1.62 | 25% |
| Q1/26 | Feb 1, 2026 | 9.6B | 656.0M | 6.8% | 2.42 | 1.62 | 67% |
| Q4/25* | Nov 2, 2025 | 12.4B | 1.1B | 8.6% | – | 1.62 | – |
| Q3/25 | Jul 27, 2025 | 12.0B | 1.3B | 10.7% | 4.75 | 1.62 | 34% |
| Q2/25 | Apr 27, 2025 | 12.8B | 1.8B | 14.1% | 6.64 | 1.62 | 24% |
| Q1/25 | Jan 26, 2025 | 8.5B | 869.0M | 10.2% | 3.19 | 1.62 | 51% |
| Q4/24* | Oct 27, 2024 | 11.1B | 1.2B | 11.2% | – | 1.47 | – |
| Q3/24 | Jul 28, 2024 | 13.2B | 1.7B | 13.2% | 6.29 | 1.47 | 23% |
| Q2/24 | Apr 28, 2024 | 15.2B | 2.4B | 15.6% | 8.53 | 1.47 | 17% |
| Q1/24 | Jan 28, 2024 | 12.2B | 1.8B | 14.4% | 6.23 | 1.47 | 24% |
| Q4/23* | Oct 29, 2023 | 15.4B | 2.4B | 15.4% | – | 1.35 | – |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $23.4M1 person | −$23.4M |
| 6 months | $00 people | $23.4M1 person | −$23.4M |
| 12 months | $00 people | $55.9M3 people | −$55.9M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on DE yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules