Automatic Data Processing (ADP) handles payroll for companies and offers software for HR management, time tracking and employee benefits. Customers are mainly small and mid-sized businesses in the US, but the company operates in many countries. As of Oct 11, 2026
ADP offers companies solutions for human resources management and payroll. Its reportable segments are called Employer Services and Professional Employer Organization. Employer Services serves companies from small businesses to large corporations, for example with payroll, benefits administration, HR management, retirement plans and insurance. The ADP TotalSource division takes over tasks such as payroll and tax filings for small and mid-sized companies under co-employment. Its platforms include RUN, ADP Workforce Now in North America and Lyric. Marketing runs through its own sales force, digital channels and partners such as accounting firms and banks.
Automatically summarized from SEC annual report (10-K, filed Aug 5, 2026) (website of the US Securities and Exchange Commission) · reviewed Oct 14, 2026
Our own calculation from the exchange’s daily candles, as of Oct 26, 2026. “All-time” applies since the start of this series, not to the whole market. Changes in percent; the TradingView chart shows prices. “Today” = change of the last trading day versus the previous day. Not investment advice.
New buy zone
A new buy zone has just formed for this symbol (valid since Oct 27, 2026). With Watcher you see it right away – with buy zone, targets and stop; for you it becomes visible on Oct 29, 2026.
An observation, not investment advice
Rule (4-hour candles) Zone valid since Oct 27, 2026 · unchanged since then Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Weekly candles (1W) No active buy zone – the last one ended in the Week from Oct 12, 2026 · Buy zone no longer valid Zone historyThe zone history shows since when a buy zone has applied, when it was adjusted and when the price touched or left it. Recording began on Oct 12, 2026, only runs forward and fills nothing in – older zones are marked “known at start of recording” or “already existing when added”.Example: New buy zone on Oct 14, no adjustment since → “zone valid since Oct 14, 2026 · unchanged since”.More in the Academy: Lesson buy zone and Fibonacci
Watcher Full history: every change of the buy zone with its date.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Zigzag (A-B-C), Corrective pattern (upward), C in progress (1 of 2 guidelines) · B = 28% of A; C = 45% of A
Alternative (not drawn): Double zigzag (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y in progress (1 of 2 guidelines)
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg A, B can also be read as three- or five-part.
Note: Retracement at least 88.7% of A: flat possible (B in progress, type only with C).
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed weekly candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 26, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y in progress (3 of 3 guidelines) · X = 67% of W; Y = 112% of W
Note: Structure ambiguous: leg X can also be read as three- or five-part.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
No buy zone of the rule on this timeframe – the chart shows only the Elliott count from the completed daily candles (recalculated every day). Not a recommendation, not investment advice. Without a buy zone there is no reference for percentages – so no value axis and no prices; measurements are ratios of wave lengths.
On 4-hour candles the rule currently has no setup, and the Elliott count finds no count that follows the rules – so there is no analysis chart. The chart is recalculated every hour.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · display only, the rule works on 4-hour candles
Elliott count: Combination (W-X-Y), Corrective pattern (upward), Y complete (1 of 3 guidelines) · X = 15% of W; Y = 56% of W
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart.
Comparison: The rule treats the last rise as the possible start of an upward impulse (without checking its history and structure). The Elliott count reads it as the end of an upward correction (Y).
Note: Structure open: leg X cannot be broken down into sub-waves on this timeframe – provisional, check the count yourself on the chart.
Elliott count calculated automatically by fixed Elliott rules, not investment advice – display only, our buy zones do not use it. Provisional: The count can change with new candles.
Automated analysis (rule-based): the rule calculates waves and Fibonacci levels from the completed hourly candles; the chart is recalculated every hour. Not investment advice. On this timeframe the chart only shows the rule setup (swing detection 4 × ATR) – the rule itself works on 4-hour candles. Axis and values: distance from the top of the buy zone in %, no prices.
On phones the drawing toolbar is hidden – drawing works better on a desktop.
Timeframe 1 week · As of Oct 23, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario and alternative: level (1 of 2 guidelines each, medium) – the simpler or clearer pattern counts as the main scenario. Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the weekly close stays above the end of B, this applies: sharp countermove upward in three waves (Zigzag A-B-C), C in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the weekly close is below the end of B
If that breaks, the second reading no longer applies either: complex countermove upward (Double zigzag W-X-Y), Y in progress – then there is no valid count for now; the next candles will produce a new one.
Invalid if the weekly close is below the end of X
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 1 day · As of Oct 26, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (3 of 3 guidelines, strong) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
As long as the daily close stays above the end of X, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y in progress – count points to rising prices.
Invalid if the daily close is below the end of X
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Watcher Fibonacci target zones and levels for this count – as a help for your own review – from Watcher.
Timeframe 4 hours · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
Currently no wave count that follows the rules on 4-hour candles – so no scenarios.
Timeframe 1 hour · As of Oct 27, 2026 · from the Elliott count in the analysis chart
Weighting Main scenario (1 of 3 guidelines, weak) · no alternative Guidelines (strength of the count)Guidelines are typical features of a count, such as usual Fibonacci lengths or a change in the form of correction. Strong means: at least three quarters met, medium: at least half, otherwise weak. Even a strong count can flip.Example: 3 of 3 guidelines → strong; 2 of 4 → medium; 1 of 3 → weak.More in the Academy: Lesson wave degrees
Weighting by guidelines met – not a probability.
smaller wave degree Smaller wave degree: more sensitive turning-point detection, because no count fits at the usual degree – it describes shorter swings. Provisional – check the count yourself on the chart. No visible sub-waves in: X.
As long as the hourly close stays below the end of Y, this applies: complex countermove upward (Combination W-X-Y), Y complete – count points to falling prices.
Invalid if the hourly close is above the end of Y (+12.0% from the top of the zone)
If that breaks, this count no longer applies. Currently no alternative that follows the rules.
Automatic Data Processing · Sector Industrials · amounts in USD
Information only – does not affect the other analysis methods, not investment advice. Source: SEC filings, As of Aug 5, 2026.
Four angles on the annual figures. Each check counts how many disclosed criteria are met – criteria without data do not count. The bars show where the company ranks on each figure among the stocks we cover and within its sector.
Fiscal year to Jun 30, 2026
46.4% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 153 peers (All). medium.
Rank 84 of 100: higher than 84% of 22 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 35.4%
Share of revenue left after the direct cost of the products sold.
20.1% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 66 of 100: higher than 66% of 237 peers (All). medium.
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 34 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 12.9%
Profit after all costs, interest and taxes divided by revenue.
73.2% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 93 of 100: higher than 93% of 218 peers (All). strong.
Rank 89 of 100: higher than 89% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 26.3%
Net income divided by equity at fiscal year end.
7.0% Fiscal year 2026 (total assets at year end)
Rank 57 of 100: higher than 57% of 238 peers (All). medium.
Rank 46 of 100: higher than 46% of 34 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 7.5%
Net income divided by total assets at fiscal year end.
9.5% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 14 of 100: higher than 14% of 239 peers (All). weak.
Rank 7 of 100: higher than 7% of 34 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: 33.2%
Equity as a share of total assets. Usually low for banks.
23.9% Fiscal year 2026
Rank 76 of 100: higher than 76% of 213 peers (All). strong.
Rank 98 of 100: higher than 98% of 32 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 10.5%
Free cash flow divided by revenue.
5.2B USD Fiscal year 2026
Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure on property and equipment.
+6.8% per year
Rank 43 of 100: higher than 43% of 230 peers (All). medium.
Rank 42 of 100: higher than 42% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +8.5%
Average growth per year over 3 fiscal years.
+7.9% per year
Rank 33 of 100: higher than 33% of 217 peers (All). medium.
Rank 38 of 100: higher than 38% of 30 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +9.2%
Average growth per year over 5 fiscal years.
+6.5% per year
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 157 peers (All). medium.
Rank 79 of 100: higher than 79% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +4.5%
Average growth per year over 10 fiscal years.
+10.0% per year
Rank 47 of 100: higher than 47% of 157 peers (All). medium.
Rank 46 of 100: higher than 46% of 23 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +10.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+12.5% per year
Rank 46 of 100: higher than 46% of 146 peers (All). medium.
Rank 45 of 100: higher than 45% of 21 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: +13.7%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
+12.9% per year
Rank 64 of 100: higher than 64% of 140 peers (All). medium.
Rank 74 of 100: higher than 74% of 21 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +8.1%
Growth of earnings per share per year, adjusted for stock splits.
61% Fiscal year 2026
Dividend per share divided by earnings per share.
+12.4% per year
Rank 67 of 100: higher than 67% of 118 peers (All). strong.
Rank 73 of 100: higher than 73% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: +7.7%
Growth of the dividend per share per year.
2.0x Fiscal year 2026
Free cash flow per share divided by dividend per share. From 1x the dividend is covered.
8 of 9 Fiscal year 2026
Rank 90 of 100: higher than 90% of 134 peers (All). strong.
Rank 88 of 100: higher than 88% of 20 peers (Sector). strong.
Median Industrials: 6.0 of 9
Nine yes/no tests on profit, cash flow, debt, liquidity and efficiency compared with the prior year.
0.82 at fiscal year end
Rank 39 of 100: lower than 39% of 199 peers (All). medium.
Rank 39 of 100: lower than 39% of 32 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: 0.62
Long-term financial debt divided by equity.
1.05 at fiscal year end
Rank 29 of 100: higher than 29% of 215 peers (All). weak.
Rank 32 of 100: higher than 32% of 33 peers (Sector). weak.
Median Industrials: 1.22
Current assets divided by current liabilities.
−5.8% in 5 years
Rank 67 of 100: lower than 67% of 199 peers (All). strong.
Rank 57 of 100: lower than 57% of 29 peers (Sector). medium.
Median Industrials: −5.4%
Change in diluted share count. Negative = share buybacks, positive = new shares.
Last fiscal year compared with the one before. Returns and revenue per total assets use total assets at the start of the year; leverage = long-term financial debt divided by total assets at year end; new shares via the average diluted share count.
Price-based criteria (P/E, dividend yield) are shown to signed-in users.
Computed automatically from SEC annual reports – not investment advice. Describes the reported figures; points are not a rating of the stock. Rank 0–100 against the 239 stocks we cover and against the sector (from 5 peers); the stronger side is always on the right.
Summarized from the lights below. Describes the reported figures – not a recommendation to buy or sell.
Fiscal year 2026 (Jul 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026): Revenue 21.9B USD · Net income 4.4B USD · Net margin 20.1%
Where the money of a fiscal year goes and how margins, returns, balance sheet, cash flow and share count developed over up to 10 years. Each chart has one sentence saying what the trend shows.
Of 100 USD of revenue, 46.4 USD gross profit and 20.1 USD net income remained.
| Item | Amount | of revenue |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 21.9B USD | 100.0% |
| Gross profit | 10.2B USD | 46.4% |
| Cost of revenue | 11.8B USD | 53.6% |
| Net income | 4.4B USD | 20.1% |
| Research & development | 1.0B USD | 4.7% |
| Interest expense | 459.3M USD | 2.1% |
| Taxes | 1.3B USD | 6.0% |
| Remaining costs & other | 3.0B USD | 13.5% |
Taxes, interest and other items are not available separately in the SEC data; they are combined as the difference.
The net margin rose in 5 years from 17.3% to 20.1%.
Gross marginNet marginReturn on equity rose in 5 years from 45.8% to 73.2%.
Return on equityReturn on assetsThe equity ratio fell in 5 years from 11.6% to 9.5%.
EquityLong-term debt in USD Long-term debt, depending on the filing, includes the current portion or leases.The current ratio stayed roughly the same in 5 years (1.05).
Current ratioFree cash flow rose in 5 years from 2.9B USD to 5.2B USD.
Operating cash flowCapital expenditureFree cash flow in USDThe share count fell in 5 years by 5.8% (mostly through share repurchases).
Diluted share countFrom annual reports filed with the SEC (10-K, 20-F, 40-F) as first reported, share count adjusted for splits; obvious filing errors (e.g. wrong unit, outliers against both neighbouring years) are hidden. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
How much the company returns to its shareholders – as dividends or by repurchasing its own shares – and whether free cash flow supports it.
The dividend per share rose in 5 years from 3.70 USD to 6.64 USD.
Dividend per share USD per share Per share as filed with the SEC, including special dividends; obvious filing errors are hidden.The payout ratio stayed roughly the same in 5 years (60.7%).
Payout ratio (earnings)Payout ratio (free cash flow)Over 5 years, 18.5B USD went back to shareholders, 42% of it through share repurchases. That is 88% of the free cash flow of those years.
Dividends paidShare repurchasesNew shares issued (including employee plans)Free cash flow in USDDividends paid, repurchases and new shares issued from the cash flow statement of annual reports filed with the SEC (as first reported). Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Price-based valuation (P/E, P/S, price/free cash flow and dividend yield per fiscal year, compared with its own average) for signed-in users. Log in
Automatic Data Processing next to 8 stocks of the sector Industrials we cover that are closest in revenue. Click a column header to sort the table.
| Symbol | Revenue (FY) | Growth 5 yrs | Gross margin | Op. margin | Net margin | ROE | Equity ratio | FCF margin | Piotroski |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETN Eaton Corporation | 27.4B USD | +9.0% | 37.6% | – | 14.9% | 21.0% | 47.1% | 12.9% | 6/9 |
| WM Waste Management | 25.2B USD | +10.6% | 40.4% | 17.1% | 10.7% | 27.1% | 21.8% | 11.2% | 6/9 |
| MMM 3M | 24.9B USD | −5.0% | 39.9% | 18.6% | 13.0% | 69.1% | 12.5% | 5.6% | 5/9 |
| UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 24.5B USD | +4.6% | – | 40.2% | 29.1% | 38.7% | 26.5% | 22.4% | – |
| JCI Johnson Controls | 23.6B USD | +1.1% | 36.4% | – | 13.9% | 25.5% | 34.1% | 9.0% | 6/9 |
| ADP Automatic Data Processing this stock | 21.9B USD | +7.9% | 46.4% | – | 20.1% | 73.2% | 9.5% | 23.9% | 8/9 |
| PH Parker Hannifin | 21.5B USD | +8.4% | 37.7% | 23.6% | 17.0% | 23.7% | 49.9% | 18.2% | 9/9 |
| TT Trane Technologies | 21.3B USD | +11.4% | – | 18.6% | 13.7% | 34.0% | 40.1% | 13.2% | – |
| EMR Emerson Electric | 18.0B USD | +1.4% | 52.8% | – | 12.7% | 11.3% | 48.3% | 14.8% | 6/9 |
| Median of the sector 34 symbols | 24.1B USD | +9.2% | 35.4% | 10.4% | 12.9% | 26.3% | 33.2% | 9.7% | 6/9 |
Growth 5 yrs = revenue growth per year over 5 fiscal years · Op. margin = operating margin · ROE = return on equity · FCF = free cash flow · Piotroski = F-Score (only with all 9 criteria).
Figures of the last fiscal year from SEC annual reports (peers as of Oct 28, 2026). Median across all companies of the sector we cover (from 5 stocks; several share classes of one company count once). Signed-in users also see P/E, P/S and dividend yield in the comparison. Describes the reported figures – not investment advice.
Each light follows a simple, disclosed rule. The comparison is with the sector median Sector medianThe middle value of all companies in a sector: half are above it, half below. Unlike the average, single outliers hardly distort it.Example: Margins 4%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 60% → median 10%, average 18.8%.More in the Academy: Lesson putting the P/E in context of all 90 symbols in the Industrials sector on our list (current members of the S&P 500 and other lists).
+7.9% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +8.0% (82 symbols)
What does this mean? Revenue: over 5 years it grew by 7.9% per year on average, but more slowly than the median company in the sector (+8.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
+11.2% per year, last 5 years
Sector Industrials: median +10.0% (66 symbols)
per share: +12.5% per year (5 years, split-adjusted)
What does this mean? Total net income: over 5 years it grew by 11.2% per year on average – at least as fast as the median company in the sector (+10.0%).
Light rule: Green: grows at least as fast as the sector median (without a sector comparison: grows) · Yellow: grows more slowly · Red: shrinks.
20.1% last fiscal year
Sector Industrials: median 11.1% (88 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 100 USD in revenue, 20.11 USD remained as profit – at least as much as the median company in the sector (11.1%). Five years ago the margin was 17.3%.
Light rule: Green: at least the sector median (without a sector comparison: profit) · Yellow: profit, but below the median · Red: loss.
0.82 latest balance sheet
Sector Industrials: median 0.58 (77 symbols)
What does this mean? For every 1 USD of equity there is 0.82 USD of financial debt – more than the median company in the sector (0.58). More debt amplifies good and bad years alike.
Light rule: Green: at most the sector median · Yellow: up to twice the median · Red: more than twice · Gray: without a sector comparison.
61% Dividend / earnings per share
Sector Industrials: median 35% (65 symbols)
What does this mean? Of every 1 USD of earnings per share, 0.61 USD went to shareholders as a dividend. Little buffer remains for weaker years. Median company in the sector: 35%.
Light rule: Green: up to 60% of earnings · Yellow: up to 100% · Red: more than earnings or a dividend despite a loss · Gray for real estate (REITs). The sector median is for comparison only.
10 of 10 fiscal years with a profit
What does this mean? In 10 of the last 10 fiscal years the bottom line showed a profit. There were no losses in this period.
Light rule: Green: profit in every year · Yellow: one loss year · Red: several loss years (at least 3 years needed).
| Year | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Jun 30, 2026 | 21.9B | 4.4B | 20.1% | 10.94 | 6.64 | 61% |
| 2025 | Jun 30, 2025 | 20.6B | 4.1B | 19.8% | 9.98 | 6.02 | 60% |
| 2024 | Jun 30, 2024 | 19.2B | 3.8B | 19.5% | 9.10 | 5.45 | 60% |
| 2023 | Jun 30, 2023 | 18.0B | 3.4B | 18.9% | 8.21 | 4.79 | 58% |
| 2022 | Jun 30, 2022 | 16.5B | 2.9B | 17.9% | 7.00 | 4.05 | 58% |
| 2021 | Jun 30, 2021 | 15.0B | 2.6B | 17.3% | 6.07 | 3.70 | 61% |
| 2020 | Jun 30, 2020 | 14.6B | 2.5B | 16.9% | 5.70 | 3.52 | 62% |
| 2019 | Jun 30, 2019 | 14.2B | 2.3B | 16.2% | 5.24 | 3.06 | 58% |
| 2018 | Jun 30, 2018 | 13.3B | 1.6B | 12.2% | 3.66 | 2.52 | 69% |
| 2017 | Jun 30, 2017 | 12.4B | 1.7B | 14.0% | 3.85 | 2.24 | 58% |
| Quarter | End | Revenue | Net income | Margin | Earnings per share | Dividend per share | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2/26* | Jun 30, 2026 | – | 978.6M | – | – | 1.70 | – |
| Q1/26 | Mar 31, 2026 | 5.9B | 1.4B | 22.9% | 3.38 | 1.70 | 50% |
| Q4/25 | Dec 31, 2025 | 5.4B | 1.1B | 19.8% | 2.62 | 1.70 | 65% |
| Q3/25 | Sep 30, 2025 | 5.2B | 1.0B | 19.6% | 2.49 | 1.54 | 62% |
| Q2/25* | Jun 30, 2025 | – | 910.7M | – | – | 1.54 | – |
| Q1/25 | Mar 31, 2025 | 5.6B | 1.2B | 22.5% | 3.06 | 1.54 | 50% |
| Q4/24 | Dec 31, 2024 | 5.0B | 963.2M | 19.1% | 2.35 | 1.54 | 66% |
| Q3/24 | Sep 30, 2024 | 4.8B | 956.3M | 19.8% | 2.34 | 1.40 | 60% |
| Q2/24* | Jun 30, 2024 | – | 829.3M | – | – | 1.40 | – |
| Q1/24 | Mar 31, 2024 | 5.3B | 1.2B | 22.6% | 2.88 | 1.40 | 49% |
| Q4/23 | Dec 31, 2023 | 4.7B | 878.4M | 18.8% | 2.13 | 1.40 | 66% |
| Q3/23 | Sep 30, 2023 | 4.5B | 859.4M | 19.0% | 2.08 | 1.25 | 60% |
* Q4 derived: fiscal year minus the 9-month value (EPS cannot be derived this way); may be distorted by restatements.
How we calculate: values as first reported to the SEC (later corrections are left out), a fixed order of reporting tags per figure, partial sums are never added up. Growth per year Growth per year (CAGR)The average annual growth rate over several years, as if the value had grown equally strongly every year. Individual good or bad years even out in it.Example: Revenue €100m → €161m in 5 years → (161 ÷ 100) to the power of 1/5 − 1 = 10% per year.More in the Academy: Lesson debt, dividends and growth over 5 years (otherwise 3 years). Quarters are labeled by the calendar quarter in which they end.
| Period | Purchases | Sales | Net |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | $00 people | $12.3M6 people | −$12.3M |
| 6 months | $745.7K1 person | $12.4M6 people | −$11.7M |
| 12 months | $745.7K1 person | $13.8M6 people | −$13.1M |
Source: mandatory filings with the SEC (Form 4), open-market purchases and sales only. General information, not investment advice.
ATR ATR (Average True Range)The average range per trading day over the last 14 days. It makes distances comparable, whether a stock costs 10 or 1,000.Example: ATR 2.50 at a price of 100: 0.4 ATR is 1.00, i.e. 1%.More in the Academy: Lesson ATR and moving averages as price values only when logged in.
Latest news
No posts on ADP yet – log in to join the discussion.
Posts are opinions of users and only visible after logging in. Community rules